Showing posts with label Psychology Essays. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Psychology Essays. Show all posts

Early Children Development in Psychology: Questions and Answers

Questions and Answers

1. Imagine that you have just had a baby, who will follow normal developmental milestones.Name your baby and describe his or her language development from birth through age five. 

Family relationships play a significant role in children's development. My baby's name would be Jackie. The baby will follow typical language development milestones considering that children are programmed to develop speech and language since birth. Even though language development continues throughout early childhood and adolescence, the first five years are most critical.

According to the insights provided by the book "real world psychology" by Catherine, language development is a continuous process throughout early childhood and into adolescence. However, the information provided by the author also shows that the five years are the most critical during language development. Therefore, it will be essential for me as the mother-to-baby Jackie to practice stimulation during the first five years to avoid slow progress and poor communication skills.

In the early stages of language development, Jackie's brain will be programmed to attend speech sounds and begin to mimic them. Early on, Jackie will start making sounds that do not precisely have meaning. Jackie will later attempt to repeat words and sounds are she hears them from the surrounding environment. Between 9 to 18 months, she will start saying the first words, which the most common, like "mama."

When Jackie reaches about 18 months, she will put words together to form simple sentences. At this age, she will develop a vocabulary of 50 to 150 words when communicating with the people around her. Jackie will improve her communication skills when she reaches two years, where she can speak and understand a substantial number of words. Jackie will start to communicate when asking for something and talk about her past experiences.

When Jackie reaches the age of 4 years, she will begin to understand and use the rules of language to quantify, connect thoughts, and express possession of something. At this age, she will be getting to the preschool with her speech becoming almost fully developed like an adult. At the age of 5 years, her language will continue to show progress until she manages to communicate effectively like an adult. As she progresses through the middle schools, her speech will continue to develop as she learns to write.

Need Help? Don’t Be Shy To Ask

2. Contrast Gardner's theory of multiple intelligence with Sternberg's tragic theory of successful intelligence. State which theory you think better explains intelligence and justify your choice.

According to Sternberg's theory, intelligence is only partly influenced by genetics because it is broad and includes much more than is measured by tests. Therefore the idea concludes that we can "teach" students to be more intelligent by teaching them how to think. On the other hand, Gardner's theory of multiple types of intelligence refers to different ways intelligence is manifested. Each kind of intelligence is reflected in brain differences where people have strengths and weaknesses in the different types of intelligence.

Sternberg argues intelligence exists in one capacity, which is made up of three distinct elements. At the same time, Gardner believes that eight types of intelligence are different enough to be classified as their types of intelligence. While Gardner recognizes aspects of Intelligence, Sternberg focuses primarily on elements of cognitive development that can be measured through somewhat traditional means. Moreover, Gardner's theory of multiple types of  intelligence focused on the outcomes that exhibited particular intelligence, whereas Sternberg's tragic theory of successful intelligence focused on approaches. Sternberg's thesis focused on understanding Intelligence, while Gardner's theory gets at how people use their intelligence differently. Besides, the two ideas also contrast because Sternberg's three components are part of Gardner's Multiple Intelligences.

 Need Help? Don’t Be Shy To Ask

3. Describe biological, genetic, and environmental influences on intelligence.

A person's level of intelligence can be influenced by biological factors such as the size of the brain. According to the information presented by the textbook, the brain's structure, the size of the cortex, and the number of neurons in the brain determine a person's level of intelligence. A person with a large brain, large numbers of neurons in the brain, and a thicker cortex is expected to show high levels of interagency. Similarly, the brain's functions also present biological influence on intelligence, where a person with high intelligence tends to do things more efficiently and quickly. Therefore, intelligence is not located in one part of the brain.

Similarly, some biological factors are connected to the genetic of a person. Research shows that twins born and raised in the same environment tend to show similarities in the level of intelligence. Thus adopted children typically demonstrate the intelligence levels of their biological parents than the adopted parents. However, genetics does not show the entire picture of the influence on intelligence. For instance, twins who are raised in a different environment typically show different levels of brightness. The impact of the environment on intelligence tends to affect children than adults. The information from the textbook also shows that intelligence is also strongly influenced by the environment. Factors related to a child's home environment and parenting, education and availability of learning resources, and nutrition all contribute to intelligence. Therefore, biological, genetic, and environmental each typically play a part in influencing a person's intelligence.

4. Discuss some of the physical issues that are confronted during middle age and large adulthood and their implications for psychological well-being.

During middle age, a person undergoes typically physical issues that lead to severe implications for psychological well-being. At this stage, cognition begins to stabilize, reaching a peak around the age of 35. Early adulthood is a time of relativistic thinking, in which young people start to become aware of more than simplistic views of right vs. wrong. Because of some of the physical issues that are confronted during middle age, they begin to look at ideas and concepts from multiple angles and understand that a question can have more than one right and or wrong answer. The need for specialization results in pragmatic thinking.

During Large adulthood, the physical issues typically reduce because of the implications developed during middle age. They create an impact on psychological well-being at this age where they began using logic to solve real-world problems while accepting contradiction, imperfection, and other issues. Finally, young adults develop a sort of expertise in either education or career. Due to physical issues such as having to deal with aging and balancing their life careers with life, they develop practical problem-solving skills. These skills are necessary to solve real-world problems and figure out how best to achieve the desired goal as implications for psychological well-being.

5. List and describe the characteristics in each of Piaget's four stages of cognitive development. Illustrate a child's abilities and limits at each level of development.

Sensorimotor stage

The sensorimotor stage is the first stage of development that lasts from birth to age 2. During this time, infants and toddlers interact with the world through their senses. Children make conclusions based on what children encounter. Children play with new objects to understand them by throwing, shaking, and putting them in their mouths. At this stage, children learn through trial and error. Children begin to realize that an object exists even when it is not in front of them during this stage. For example, when a mother plays peek-a-boo with the child, he knows she is still there when she covers her face.

Preoperational stage 

The preoperational stage is the second stage which usually lasts from about age 2 to age 7. Here, children develop language skills. Children learn to speak in words and to use symbols. Children can also understand letters, numbers, and spatial concepts such as the difference between "on" and "in." Children know the difference between the past and the future. However, for the most part, children remain focused on the present. Children at this stage tend to think primarily of themselves. Their worldview is self-centered. Children assume others share their point of view.

Concrete operations stage

The concrete operations stage is the third stage which lasts from about age 7 to age one, and it is also called the preteen years. Children shift from a self-focused view and begin to imagine events beyond themselves and their lives. Children grasp the concept of cause and effect. Children at this stage develop logic and reasoning skills. Nevertheless, children still depend on concrete facts and physical objects to conclude. Children understand some abstract concepts in fields such as math. However, children still rely on what children can observe. Most cannot solve equations with multiple variables.

Formal operations stage

The formal operations stage is the last stage that exists at around age 11to 15 years. At this stage, children develop abstract and hypothetical reasoning. In decision-making, children are now more likely to consider moral and ethical questions. Children can also weigh the likelihood that something could happen.

Contact us now to get custom essays written for you in less than 12 hours


 

LatanĂ© and Darley’s Model of Helping Sample Essay APA

LatanĂ© and Darley’s Model of Helping

Need Help? Don’t Be Shy To Ask.

Helping others during an emergency is one of the basic natures of human beings. However, it can be hard to notice some of the unexpected things around us when conducting activities in our daily lives. Considering that emergencies are unusual and dangerous, people do not always know what to do when faced with such situations. According to the insights presented by the textbook, any behavior that is designed to help another person during an emergency without any direct reward is called altruism. Additionally, the social norms for helping, which include the reciprocity norm, remind people to follow the principles of reciprocal altruism and the social responsibility norm. Such principles demand that people try to help others who need assistance, even without future payback expectations.

To better understand the processes of helping in an emergency, Darley et al. developed a model of helping that determines whether a bystander will help or not help during a situation. The decision model of bystander intervention has represented an important theoretical framework for helping us understand the role of situational variables in helping. According to the model, whether or not we help depends on the outcomes of a series of decisions that involve noticing the event, interpreting the situation as one that requires assistance, deciding to take personal responsibility, and implementing action. For instance, people with generous personalities are more helpful than others. Moreover, the perception of the need is important, considering that people tend to help some people more than others.

The research conducted previously on bystander intervention during an emergency shows that an individual is more likely to intervene if he witnesses the emergency alone than an individual in a group. The study presented by the article aimed to investigate the bystander effect. The study qualified the general finding from the previous studies in the framework of group communication processes. During the experiment, fifty male Princeton University undergraduates served as subjects where Pairs of subjects working on a task overheard a loud crash in an adjoining room. 

Some subjects were seated in a pattern that facilitated the visual communication exchanges that naturally occur when a noisy event occurs. Others were seated to block these communications. When the emergency occurred, groups which could exchange reactions were not reliably less likely to respond than were the third group of subjects who faced the emergency alone. The blocked communications groups tended not to respond and responded significantly less than the other two conditions. These results were interpreted as supporting the hypothesis that a group of people who witness an ambiguous event interact with arriving at a definition or interpretation of it, which then guides each member's reactions to the event (Darley et al., 1973).

Contact us now to get custom essays written for you in less than 12 hours

The results supported the experimental hypothesis of the bystander's effect, which states that an individual tends to intervene during an emergency compared to when in a group. The results from the experiment showed that 80% of the groups in a face-to-face orientation responded to the crash with the offer of some help. In contrast, only 20% of those groups not facing each other reacted when the incident occurred. 

Similarly, 90% of subjects reacted to the situation when alone. As a result,  99% of a set of two-person groups could be expected to contain at least one individual who responds. Suppose the effect of the group on helping behavior is due to anything other than a simple increase in the number of people over the alone condition. In that case, the rate of helping in a group should be significantly different from 99% (Darley et al., 1973).

Moreover, the results also showed that the response rate of the face-to-face groups was not significantly different from the value. While the 20% response rate of the non-facing condition was significantly lower, the Helping rate was affected not simply by the presence of other bystanders but by their physical orientation. The groups in a facing orientation were more likely to respond than non-facing groups. Besides, the facing groups were not significantly slower or less likely to respond than those alone when the incident occurred.

To better understand the processes of helping in an emergency, Darley et al. developed a model of helping that determines whether a bystander will help or not help during a situation. According to the model, several processes may be involved in the bystander's effect, which is related to the definition of the situation. The first step is noticing the emergency where the bystander sees the event. The second step is to assume responsibility, where a person assumes responsibility assumes that others will offer help. The proposed five-step decision model of help can be utilized to determine what a bystander might decide to do during an emergency situation that requires intervention.

 

 Need Help? Don’t Be Shy To Ask.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Darley, J., Teger, A., & Lewis, L. (1973). Do groups always inhibit individuals' responses to potential emergencies?. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology26(3), 395-399. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034450

SHAVER, K. (2017). PRINCIPLES OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. PSYCHOLOGY Press.

Contact us now to get custom essays written for you in less than 12 hours