Planning Care in Practice

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assignment Title: Planning Care in Practice

Unit 414: Planning Care In Practice

Student ID:

Date of Submission.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table of Contents

Contents

Table of Contents. 2

Contents. 2

Introduction. 3

LO2 Care Plan. 7

References. 20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Introduction

Planning care in practice is an important aspect of healthcare that ensures individuals receive safe, effective, and person-centred support tailored to their needs. It involves assessing patient conditions, identifying needs, setting goals, and implementing appropriate interventions in collaboration with multidisciplinary teams. Care planning and assessment are structured processes that guide safe nursing practice (Ellis and Standing, 2023). Effective care planning improves patient outcomes, enhances communication among professionals, and promotes continuity of care. Thus, the assignment will explore different methods of assessment, theoretical perspectives, and legislative frameworks that guide care planning. It also reflects on practical applications within a healthcare setting, highlighting the importance of person-centred approaches and professional responsibilities.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LO1 Comparison table: Activity 1A

 

Methods of Assessment

Description

Types of assessment linked 

Implementation in your work placement or practice

Advantages

Challenges

Initial Assessment

Conducted when a patient first enters care to identify immediate needs

Holistic assessment

On admission, I collect patient history, vital signs, and concerns

Provides baseline data, supports early intervention

Time constraints, incomplete information

Ongoing Assessment

Continuous monitoring of patient condition

Formative assessment

Regular observation of vitals, mobility, and emotional state

Detects changes early, improves safety

Can be time-consuming

Risk Assessment

Identifies potential risks (e.g., falls, pressure sores)

Preventative assessment

Use of risk tools like fall risk charts

Enhances patient safety

May rely on subjective judgement

Self-Assessment

Patient contributes information about their own health

Person-centred assessment

Patients describe pain levels or emotional wellbeing

Promotes autonomy and engagement

Some patients unable to communicate effectively

Clinical Assessment

In-depth medical evaluation by professionals

Diagnostic assessment

Conducted by nurses/doctors for diagnosis and treatment planning

Accurate diagnosis and care planning

Requires expertise and equipment

Write a summary (5-10 sentences) comparing the different assessment methods and how they relate to your own practice in healthcare settings. Reflect on which methods you find most effective and why

Different assessment methods play a crucial role in planning effective care. Initial assessments provide a baseline understanding of a patient’s needs, while ongoing assessments ensure continuous monitoring and timely interventions. Risk assessments are essential for preventing harm, particularly in vulnerable individuals, while self-assessments promote patient involvement and person-centered care. Clinical assessments provide detailed medical insights that guide treatment decisions. In my practice, I find ongoing and risk assessments most effective because they directly contribute to patient safety and allow early identification of deterioration. For example, regularly monitoring a patient at risk of falls enables timely interventions such as mobility support. Self-assessment is also valuable, especially when patients can communicate their needs clearly, as it enhances trust and collaboration. As a result, combining multiple assessment methods ensures a holistic and responsive approach to care planning.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discuss the application of theoretical perspectives to planning care or episodes of care in the workplace (Apply examples from practice)

Theoretical perspectives provide a framework for understanding patient needs and guiding care planning. One key approach is the person-centred care model, which focuses on treating individuals with dignity, respect, and involvement in decision-making. In practice, this involves actively listening to patients and incorporating their preferences into care plans. Another important theory is Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, which prioritises basic physiological needs such as food, hydration, and safety before addressing psychological and emotional wellbeing. For example, in my workplace, ensuring a patient’s pain is managed and they are comfortable is prioritised before focusing on social or emotional support. The biopsychosocial model is also widely used, recognising that health is influenced by biological, psychological, and social factors. In practice, this means considering not only a patient’s medical condition but also their mental health and social circumstances. For instance, when planning care for an elderly patient, I consider their mobility, emotional wellbeing, and family support system. The theoretical perspectives support holistic care planning and ensure that interventions are tailored to the individual’s overall needs rather than just their medical condition.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Review how legislative and regulatory frameworks support equality and diversity when planning care or episodes of care in the workplace (Apply examples from practice).

Legislative and regulatory frameworks play a vital role in ensuring equality and diversity in care planning. Key legislation such as the Equality Act 2010 ensures that individuals are not discriminated against based on characteristics such as age, gender, race, disability, or religion. In practice, this means providing equal access to care and making reasonable adjustments for individuals with specific needs. The Care Act 2014 promotes person-centred care and emphasises the importance of wellbeing, independence, and safeguarding. In my workplace, this is applied by involving patients in decisions about their care and ensuring their preferences are respected.

Additionally, the Mental Capacity Act 2005 supports individuals who may lack the capacity to make decisions. It ensures that decisions are made in the patient’s best interests while encouraging participation wherever possible. For example, when a patient cannot consent, healthcare professionals work with family members and follow legal guidelines to make appropriate decisions. Thus, the frameworks ensure that care planning is fair, inclusive, and respectful of individual differences. They guide healthcare professionals in delivering ethical and legally compliant care while promoting dignity and respect for all patients.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LO2 Care Plan

 

HEALTHCARE PLAN

PATIENT INFORMATION

Patient name: Richard Bradley  

Title: Mr

NHS Number:347777

Date of birth: / / Approx. late 60s

Address: N/A

 

 

 

 

 

Post code:34,west road

Contact details: N/A

Named accountable GP: Assigned GP

Care coordinator (if appropriate):Nurse

 

Other named professionals (e.g. care coordinator, other healthcare professionals or social worker) involved in patient's care, if appropriate (include contact details where possible): Community Nurse

Has information been shared on the patient’s behalf?: YES / NO If YES, by whom: (only applicable where the patient does not have the capacity to make this decision) Patient (or other allowed individual) consent to share information:

         with other healthcare professionals involved in the patient's care YES/NO

         with the multi-disciplinary team

YES/NO

NEXT OF KIN/CARER/RESPONSIBLE ADULTS INFORMATION

Name: names withheld

Title: Mr.

Address (if different from above): N/A

 

 

Post code: N/A

Contact details: N/A

 

Relationship: Son

Additional emergency contact (if appropriate): N/A

 

Name: N/A

 

Contact details: N/A

 

Relationship: N/A

PATIENTS MEDICAL INFORMATION

Relevant conditions, diagnosis and latest test results:

Rheumatoid arthritis

Reduced mobility

Risk of malnutrition

Social isolation

 

Significant past medical history: Bereavement (loss of spouse 18 months ago)

Current medication: Pain medication (inconsistent use)

 

 

Date of planned review of medications:

Allergies: None known

KEY ACTION POINTS

For example: guidance on intervention/deterioration, unmet need to support patient (specify)

·         Monitor medication adherence

·         Support mobility and reduce fall risk

·         Improve nutrition and hydration

·         Address social isolation

·         Provide emotional support

My Responsibilities and Duties

·         Monitor and report changes in condition

·         Provide person-centred support

·         Maintain accurate records

·         Communicate with multidisciplinary team

·         Promote independence and dignity

Identified Goals

·         Improve mobility and pain management

·         Increase social interaction

·         Maintain personal hygiene

·         Promote independence in daily living

·         Improve emotional wellbeing

My Responsibilities and Duties

·         Monitor and report changes in condition

·         Provide person-centered support

·         Maintain accurate records

·         Communicate with multidisciplinary team

·         Promote independence and dignity

OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION

For example additional information on his/her preferences or availability of resources.

·         Prefers familiar routines

·         Previously enjoyed volunteering

·         Needs encouragement to engage socially

My Responsibilities and Duties

·         Maintain accurate records

·         Communicate with multidisciplinary team

·         Promote independence and dignity

Any special physical or medical considerations (e.g. specific postural or support needs or information about medical condition – patient needs at least x mgs of drug before it works, etc.):

 

 

SIGNATORIES (if appropriate and / or possible)

 

Patient signature:

 

 

 

Date:3/21/2026

 

Carer (if applicable) signature:

 

 

 

Date:3/21/2026

 

Named accountable GP signature:2

 

 

 

Date:3/21/2026

 

Care Coordinator signature (if applicable):

 

 

 

Date:3/21/2026

 

Anticipatory care plan agreed: YES / NO/ N/A

Anticipatory drugs supplied: YES / NO/ N/A

Emergency care and treatment discussed: YES / NO

If yes, please specify outcome:

 

e.g.: cardiopulmonary resuscitation – has the patient agreed a DNR or what treatment should be given if seizures last longer than x or y, etc.

Date of assessment: / 3/21/202

Date of review(s): 3/21/202

Any special communication considerations (e.g. patient is deaf or language communication differences):

·         Pain management before activity

·         Risk of falls

·         Emotional vulnerability due to bereavement

 

 

 

Demonstrate own contribution to the care planning process or planning episodes of care in the workplace (Apply examples from practice).

In my role as a Clinical Support Worker at 5 Heather Close Centre, my contribution to the care planning process for Richard Bradley involves participating in assessments, identifying risks, and supporting the implementation of interventions. For example, I contributed by observing that Richard Bradley was struggling with mobility and appeared socially withdrawn. I documented these findings and reported them to the nurse in charge, which supported the development of a care plan addressing both physical and emotional needs. Similarly, I have also contributed by supporting Richard Bradley with daily living activities, such as encouraging personal hygiene and assisting with meal preparation. During interactions, I engaged him in conversation about his past interests, such as volunteering, which helped identify opportunities to reintroduce social engagement into his care plan.

Furthermore, I worked collaboratively with other professionals by sharing relevant information and following agreed care strategies. This ensured that care delivery remained consistent and aligned with planned outcomes. My contribution supports a holistic approach to care, addressing not only physical health but also emotional and social wellbeing. In my role as a Clinical Support Worker at 5 Heather Close Centre, I contribute actively to the care planning process by supporting individuals in their daily needs while working collaboratively with the multidisciplinary team. My role involved observing, recording, and reporting changes in service users’ physical, emotional, and social wellbeing, which informs the development and review of care plans. Additionally, I contribute by supporting the implementation of care plans in practice. For instance, I assist service users with personal care, meal preparation, and mobility while promoting independence and dignity.

In one case, I encouraged a service user to participate in their daily routine by offering choices and reassurance, which improved their engagement and confidence. This aligns with person-centred care principles, which emphasise involving individuals in decisions about their care. Communication is another key aspect of my contribution where I strived to maintain effective communication with service users, their families, and healthcare professionals to ensure continuity of care. For example, I communicated with a service user’s relative regarding changes in behaviour, which helped provide a more holistic understanding of their needs. This supports coordinated care and improves outcomes.

Furthermore, I ensure that all care provided is documented accurately and in line with organisational policies. This includes recording daily activities, changes in condition, and any concerns. Accurate documentation supports accountability and ensures that all team members are informed, which is essential for safe and effective care delivery (Ellis et al., 2023). I also promote person-centred care by respecting service users’ preferences, cultural values, and choices. For example, I supported a service user by adapting their routine to reflect their personal preferences, which improved their comfort and wellbeing. This demonstrates the importance of tailoring care to individual needs. Thus, my contribution to the care planning process involves observation, communication, implementation, and documentation. By working collaboratively with the multidisciplinary team and applying person-centred approaches, I help ensure that care plans are effective, responsive, and aligned with the individual’s needs.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assess how an individual’s wellbeing has been maintained through effective communication when implementing a plan of care or planning an episode of care in own workplace (Apply examples from practice)

Effective communication plays a critical role in maintaining Richard Bradley’s wellbeing during care planning and implementation. By using clear, respectful, and empathetic communication, I was able to build trust and encourage Richard Bradley to express his concerns, particularly regarding pain management and feelings of isolation. For instance, Richard Bradley initially appeared reluctant to discuss his difficulties. Through active listening and reassurance, I encouraged him to share that he often forgot to take his medication, which contributed to increased pain and reduced mobility. The information was communicated to the healthcare team, leading to adjustments in his medication routine and additional support. Communication also supported emotional wellbeing by reducing feelings of loneliness. Engaging Richard Bradley in meaningful conversations and involving him in decisions helped improve his confidence and sense of control. Additionally, maintaining communication with his family ensured they were informed and involved, which strengthened support systems around him. Thus, effective communication ensured that care was responsive, coordinated, and aligned with Richard Bradley’s needs, contributing positively to his overall wellbeing.

 

 

 

 

 

Critically reflect on own role in using theory to inform creation or implementation of care plans/plans for episodes of care (Apply examples from practice)

 

Reflecting on my role, I recognize that theoretical frameworks significantly influence how I approach care planning. The application of person-centered care theory guided me to prioritize Richard Bradley’s preferences and actively involve him in decision-making. This approach improved his engagement and willingness to participate in care. Additionally, the biopsychosocial model helped me understand that Richard Bradley’s condition was not solely physical but also influenced by emotional and social factors, such as bereavement and isolation. This awareness allowed me to contribute to a more holistic care plan that addressed multiple aspects of his wellbeing.

However, I also recognize limitations in my practice. For example, time constraints and workload pressures sometimes limit the depth of interaction I can have with patients. This can impact the ability to fully apply theoretical models in practice. To improve, I need to develop better time management skills and prioritize meaningful patient engagement. Furthermore, I acknowledge the importance of continuous professional development to strengthen my understanding of theory and its application. By enhancing my knowledge and reflective practice, I can contribute more effectively to care planning and improve patient outcomes. As a result, this experience has reinforced the importance of integrating theory into practice while remaining adaptable to real-world challenges.


Reflective Log (LO4)

Student name

Amma

 

Unit number and title

Unit 414: Planning Care In Practice

Assessment criteria

LO3: Review the benefits of planning person-centred care/episodes of care in the workplace

LO4: Reflect upon the impact of the planning of care/episodes of care on practitioners, individuals, family and carers in relation to own practice

Activity

Using the reflective logbook;

Describe the benefits of person-centred planning; Discuss the benefits of implementing a care plan or planning episodes of her care. Discuss the use of a range of strategies to implement person-centred care plans or in planning episodes of care.

 Reflect on the partnership between individuals and self during planning of care/episodes of care in relation to vocational scenario and own practice. Reflect on the partnership between families and carers, and self during planning of care/episodes of care in relation to vocational scenario and own practice. Review in detail specific aspects of the care planning process and their impact on the  individual, family and carers; finally, critically reflect on the planning process in relation to own practice with service users, families and carers, and other care professionals.

 

 

Describe the benefits of person-centred planning? (Link to current practice)

Person-centered planning is a fundamental approach in health and social care that ensures individuals are placed at the center of decision-making regarding their care. One key benefit is that it promotes dignity, respect, and individuality by recognizing each person’s unique needs, preferences, and values. In practice, this approach allows individuals like Richard Bradley to feel valued and heard, particularly following significant life changes such as bereavement. Another benefit is improved engagement and cooperation with care plans. When individuals are involved in planning their care, they are more likely to adhere to interventions. For example, involving Richard Bradley in decisions about his daily routine and social activities increased his willingness to participate in care. Person-centered planning also enhances emotional wellbeing by reducing feelings of isolation and loss of control. In Richard Bradley’s case, acknowledging his past involvement in volunteering helped identify meaningful activities that could be reintroduced, improving his sense of purpose. As a result, this approach leads to better health outcomes, increased independence, and improved quality of life.

 

Discuss the benefits of implementing care planning or planning episodes of care in the workplace. (Link to current practice)

Implementing care planning in the workplace provides a structured approach to delivering consistent and effective care. One major benefit is improved coordination among healthcare professionals. Care plans ensure that all team members are aware of the individual’s needs, goals, and interventions, reducing the risk of miscommunication. In the case of Mr Richard Bradley, the care plan ensured that professionals addressed his physical, emotional, and social needs collectively. For example, addressing his medication adherence alongside his social isolation ensured a holistic approach to care. Another benefit is enhanced patient safety. Through structured care planning, risks such as falls, malnutrition, and medication errors can be identified and managed proactively. In practice, regular monitoring of Mr Richard Bradley’s mobility and nutrition helped prevent further deterioration. Care planning also supports accountability and professional practice. It ensures that care provided is documented, reviewed, and aligned with organisational standards. This improves the overall quality of care and ensures compliance with legal and ethical requirements.

Discuss the use of a range of strategies to implement person-centred care plans or in planning episodes of care. (Link to current practice)

A range of strategies can be used to effectively implement person-centred care plans. One key strategy is effective communication, which involves active listening, empathy, and clear information sharing. In practice, engaging Mr Richard Bradley in conversations about his preferences helped tailor interventions to his needs. Another important strategy is multidisciplinary teamwork. Collaboration between nurses, carers, social workers, and family members ensures that all aspects of the individual’s needs are addressed. For Mr Richard Bradley, involving his family and neighbour provided additional support and improved continuity of care. Risk assessment and regular reviews are also essential strategies. Continuous monitoring allows care plans to be adapted based on changes in the individual’s condition. For example, reviewing Mr Richard Bradley’s mobility and pain levels ensured timely adjustments to his care. Additionally, a strengths-based approach focuses on what the individual can do rather than their limitations. Encouraging Mr Richard Bradley to reconnect with activities he previously enjoyed helped build confidence and independence. These strategies ensure that care remains flexible, responsive, and tailored to the individual.

 

Reflect on the partnership between individuals and self during planning of care/episodes of care in relation to vocational scenario and own practice. (Must give examples from practice)

In my practice, partnership working with individuals is essential in delivering effective care. Reflecting on my interaction with Mr. Richard Bradley, I recognized the importance of building trust and encouraging open communication. Initially, Mr. Richard Bradley appeared withdrawn and reluctant to engage, which presented a challenge in understanding his needs. By adopting a patient-centered approach, I focused on active listening and showing empathy. Over time, Mr. Richard Bradley became more comfortable sharing his concerns, particularly regarding pain management and loneliness. This partnership allowed me to involve him in decision-making, such as choosing preferred daily routines and discussing social activities. The experience highlighted that effective partnership requires patience, respect, and consistent communication. It also reinforced the importance of empowering individuals to take an active role in their care, which ultimately improves outcomes and satisfaction.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reflect on the partnership between families and carers, and self during planning of care/episodes of care in relation to vocational scenario and own practice. (Must give examples from practice)

Partnership with families and carers is equally important in care planning. In Mr Richard Bradley’s case, his children and neighbour played a significant role in supporting his wellbeing. Reflecting on my practice, I recognised the importance of involving them in communication and decision-making processes. For example, maintaining communication with Mr Richard Bradley’s children ensured they were informed about his condition and care plan. This helped them feel reassured and allowed them to contribute to decisions regarding his support needs. Similarly, engaging with his neighbour helped clarify her role in providing informal support. However, challenges arose in balancing confidentiality with family involvement. It was essential to ensure that Mr Richard Bradley’s consent was obtained before sharing information. This experience emphasised the importance of professional boundaries and ethical practice. Overall, effective collaboration with families and carers strengthens support systems and enhances the quality of care provided.

Review in detail specific aspects of the care planning process and their impact on the service user, family and carers; finally . (Must give examples from practice)

The care planning process has a significant impact on individuals, families, and healthcare professionals. For Mr Richard Bradley, the process improved his physical health, emotional wellbeing, and social engagement. Addressing his pain management and mobility needs helped increase his independence, while social interventions reduced isolation. For his family, the care planning process provided reassurance and clarity about his condition and the support he was receiving. It also allowed them to remain involved despite living at a distance. From a professional perspective, the care planning process improved coordination and communication among team members. However, it also highlighted challenges such as time constraints and resource limitations, which can affect the quality of care planning. As a result, the process demonstrated the importance of a holistic and collaborative approach in achieving positive outcomes.

Critically reflect on the planning process in relation to own practice with service user, families and carers, and other care professionals (Must give examples from practice)

Critically reflecting on the planning process, I recognise that while person-centred care is highly effective, its implementation can be influenced by practical challenges. In my experience, factors such as workload pressures, limited time, and staffing shortages can restrict the ability to fully engage with individuals. In Mr Richard Bradley’s case, although efforts were made to involve him in care planning, there were moments where time constraints limited deeper interaction. This highlights a gap between theoretical ideals and real-world practice. However, I also recognise the strengths of my approach, particularly in building rapport and using communication to support his engagement. Applying theoretical models such as the biopsychosocial approach allowed for a more comprehensive understanding of his needs. To improve my practice, I aim to enhance my time management skills and prioritise meaningful interactions with patients. Additionally, I will continue to develop my knowledge of person-centred approaches and reflective practice to ensure continuous improvement. In conclusion, effective care planning requires a balance between theoretical knowledge and practical application. By critically reflecting on my practice, I can identify areas for improvement and contribute to better outcomes for individuals, families, and the wider healthcare team.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What skills and/or qualities needs improving or developing? (Must give examples from practice)

One key skill that requires further development is advanced communication skills, particularly when working with individuals who have cognitive impairments such as dementia. In my practice with Mr Richard, I found that although I used simple language, there were occasions where she remained confused about her medication routine. This highlighted the need to develop more effective strategies such as using visual aids, repetition, and reassurance to enhance understanding. Effective communication is essential in promoting patient engagement and ensuring safe care delivery (NICE, 2021). Another area for improvement is time management. In busy healthcare environments, it can be challenging to balance multiple responsibilities while still providing person-centred care. For example, while supporting Mr Richard, there were instances where limited time reduced my ability to fully engage in meaningful conversations, which are important for understanding her emotional needs. Improving time management skills would enable me to prioritise tasks more effectively and allocate sufficient time for patient interaction, which is essential for holistic care. Knowledge and application of care theories is another area that can be strengthened. While I applied person-centred care and the biopsychosocial model in practice, I recognise that a deeper understanding of these theories would enhance my ability to apply them more consistently. For instance, better knowledge of dementia care approaches would improve how I support individuals like Mr Richard in maintaining independence while ensuring safety.

 

Additionally, confidence in multidisciplinary teamwork needs further development. Although I contributed to discussions about Mr Richard’ care, I sometimes felt hesitant to share observations with more experienced professionals. Developing confidence and assertiveness will enable me to communicate more effectively within the team and contribute more actively to decision-making processes, which is essential for coordinated care delivery.

Key Challenges (Must give examples from practice)

 

One key challenge in care planning is communication barriers, particularly when supporting individuals with cognitive impairments such as dementia. In my practice with Mr Richard, her memory loss and confusion made it difficult for her to understand instructions regarding medication and daily routines. This sometimes resulted in repeated explanations and increased time spent ensuring understanding. Communication difficulties can negatively affect patient engagement and the effectiveness of care plans if not managed appropriately (NICE, 2021). Another significant challenge is time constraints within healthcare settings. Due to high workloads and limited staffing, it is not always possible to spend sufficient time with each individual to fully implement person-centred care. In Mr Richard’ case, there were occasions where limited time reduced opportunities for deeper interaction, which may have affected the quality of engagement and understanding of her needs. Research suggests that time pressures can impact the ability of healthcare professionals to deliver holistic and individualised care. A further challenge is balancing independence with safety. While person-centred care promotes independence, individuals like Mr Richard are at risk of harm due to medication errors and falls. For example, allowing her to manage her medication independently posed risks due to her forgetfulness, requiring careful supervision. This highlights the need to balance autonomy with safeguarding responsibilities, as outlined in care practice guidelines (Department of Health and Social Care, 2023).

 

Multidisciplinary communication can also present challenges. Although teamwork is essential, miscommunication or delays in sharing information between professionals can affect care delivery. In practice, ensuring that all team members were updated on Mr Richard’ medication adherence required consistent documentation and communication, which can sometimes be difficult in busy environments.

 

Additionally, family involvement and confidentiality can be complex. While Mr Richard’ daughter played an important role in supporting her care, it was necessary to ensure that information sharing was done with consent and in line with legal frameworks. Balancing family involvement with the patient’s rights and privacy can sometimes create ethical challenges in practice (NICE, 2021).

 

 

 

References

Ellis, P. and Standing, M. (2023) Patient assessment and care planning in nursing. 4th edn. London: Learning Matters. Available at: https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=474dae3b-993a-3fc5-968c-d415d872d94e

Carrier, J. (2023) Managing long-term conditions and chronic illness in primary care: a guide to good practice. 3rd edn. London: Routledge. Available at: https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=37886c19-7fad-3242-9147-a29cf4795bf3

Department of Health (2010) Essence of Care 2010: Benchmarks for the fundamental aspects of care. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/216691/dh_119978.pdf

Department of Health and Social Care (2023) Care and support statutory guidance. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/care-act-statutory-guidance

Department for Education (2025) Working Together to Safeguard Children. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/working-together-to-safeguard-children

 

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2021) Shared decision making (NG197). Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng197

 

NHS England (2019) Safeguarding policy. Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/safeguarding-policy.pdf

 

NHS England (2024) Safeguarding children, young people and adults at risk in the NHS. Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/safeguarding-children-young-people-and-adults-at-risk-in-the-nhs-safeguarding-accountability-and-assurance-framework/

 

Royal College of Nursing (2018) Adult safeguarding: Roles and competencies for healthcare staff. Available at: https://www.rcn.org.uk

 

Student signature

Amma

Date 3/21/202

 

 

 

Assessor name

 

 

Assessor signature

 

Date 3/21/2026